MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165246552 · doi:10.5539/ijb.v2n2p181

Specific Resistance Genes in Wheat Chinese Landrace ‘Wangshuibai’ against Two Iranian Mycosphaerella graminicola Isolates

2010· article· en· W2165246552 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Reza Talebı, Mohsen Mardi, Nadali Babaeian Jelodar, Mohammad Reza Razavi, Seyed Mostafa Pirseyedi, G.H.J. Kema, Rahim Mehrabi, Mohsen Ebrahimi, Thierry C. Marcel

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Biology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMycosphaerella graminicolaBiologySeptoriaPopulationMycosphaerellaMicrosatellitePlant disease resistanceGeneCultivarGraminicolaSeedlingResistance (ecology)BotanyGeneticsAgronomyAllele

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Septoria tritici blotch, caused by the fungus Mycosphaerella graminicola, is currently the major foliar disease ofwheat world-wide, and new sources of resistance and knowledge about the genetics of resistance are needed toimprove breeding for resistance against this disease. An F10 recombinant inbred population from a cross between‘Wangshuibai’ (Chinese landrace) and the susceptible cultivar ‘Seri82’ was tested at seedling stage undercontrolled greenhouse conditions. Two isolate-specific genes for resistance to Iranian M.graminicola isolatesIPO08002 and IPO08003 were detected on Chromosomes 2BL and 7DS, respectively. For both genes theresistance was derived from ‘Wangshuibai’ at positions where Stb9 (on 2BL) and Stb4 (on 7DS) have been reported previously. These two genes are closely linked to microsatellite markers, which can be used formarker-assisted selection. ‘Wangshuibai’ may therefore be a valuable source of resistance to STB for wheatbreeding, especially in Mediterranean environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of BiologySame topicWheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyFrench-language works237,207