Acid catalyzed intramolecular attack of <i>β</i>‐phenylthioureido group on amide function. Parallel formation of thiodihydrouracil and 4‐iminothiodihydrouracil. Different pathways in the Edman degradation reaction in the formation of six‐ <i>versus</i> five‐membered cyclic intermediates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Contrary to the cleavage of α ‐phenylthioureido peptides 1 proceeding through intermediate 2‐anilinothiazolinone 2 , the b‐analog cis ‐2‐(3‐phenylthioureido)cyclopentane‐carboxamide 5 forms transiently 4‐imino‐2‐thioxopyrimidine 6 . Monitoring amide cyclization and hydrolysis of iminopyrimidine 6 in acid by UV showed that an equilibrium between 5 and 6 was reached followed by slower conversion of both compounds into 2‐oxo‐4‐thioxopyrimidine 7 . Both processes were characterized by isosbestic points, the first due to parallel conversion of 5 into 6 and 7 (or 6 into 5 and 7 ) at a constant ratio while the second identical for both reactants – to conversion of equilibrated 5 and 6 into 7 . The special isosbestic points allowed the determination of the individual constants of Scheme 2. Further confirmation was obtained from NMR product analysis and following the cyclization of amide 5 in DMSO:DCl. Product 2‐oxo‐4‐ thioxopyrimidine 7 hydrolyzed reversibly to thioureido acid 8 . The cyclization rate of 8 allowed the participation of 6‐oxothiazine 10 formed by sulfur attack to be excluded. The absence of sulfur attack in the six‐membered case is explained by the longer CS bond bringing about greater bond angle strain at the tetrahedral ring atoms due to the geometrical characteristics of five‐ and six‐membered rings with planar segments. The cyclizations of amide 5 to iminopyrimidine 6 and to thiodihydrouracil 7 are first order in [H + ], while the reactions of protonated imine 6 H + are zero order to amide and −1 to thiodihydrouracil. The reaction orders can be reconciled by assuming a rate determining proton transfer from the tetrahedral intermediate in amide cyclization. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".