MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165315214 · doi:10.1093/europace/euq097

Atrio-ventricular conduction following radiofrequency ablation for atrio-ventricular node reentry tachycardia in children

2010· article· en· W2165315214 on OpenAlexaff
Michal J. Kantoch, Joseph Atallah, Richa Soni

Bibliographic record

VenueEP Europace · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaStollery Children's HospitalHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineReentryRadiofrequency ablationCardiologyInternal medicineAblationVentricular tachycardiaAtrioventricular nodeTachycardia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: The study was designed to assess atrio-ventricular (AV) conduction with non-invasive methods at least 1 year after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the slow pathway for AV node reentry tachycardia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Medical records of all patients who underwent RFA before their 18th birthday were reviewed. Patients were brought back for clinical evaluation, an electrocardiogram, an exercise stress test, and ambulatory Holter monitoring. Radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway above the ostium of the coronary sinus was done in 106 children. No procedure resulted in high degree AV block. Follow-up evaluation was possible in 67 patients (63% of the total cohort) who were brought back to the clinic 1-13.7 years, mean 4.7+/-3.0 years after the procedure. Dizzy spells were reported by 36% of examined patients and 2 patients reported syncope. PR intervals were normal in all but two patients when compared with published normal values. One patient presented with persistent, post-procedural first-degree AV block and another developed new onset, symptomatic second degree AV block 2 years after the procedure and required pacemaker implantation. CONCLUSION: Non-invasive testing showed normal PR intervals in a cohort of patients who underwent RFA of the slow pathway in childhood or adolescence. Late AV block occurred in one child. Clinical evaluation more than a year after the procedure is warranted in symptomatic patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEP EuropaceSame topicCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207