Coupling of Posterior Cytoskeletal Morphogenesis to the G1/S Transition in the<i>Trypanosoma brucei</i>Cell Cycle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The expression levels of four Cdc2-related kinases (CRK1, 2, 4, and 6) in the procyclic form of Trypanosoma brucei were knocked down in pairs using the RNA interference (RNAi) technique. A double knockdown of CRK1 and CRK2 resulted in arrested cell growth in the G1 phase accompanied by an apparent cessation of nuclear DNA synthesis. The arrested cells became elongated at the posterior end like the G1-phase cells generated by knockdown of CycE1/CYC2 in a previous study. However, approximately 5% of the G1 cells in the current study also possessed multiply branched posterior ends, which have not previously been observed in T. brucei. DAPI and immunofluorescence staining showed a single nucleus, kinetoplast, basal body, and flagellum in the anterior portion of each G1 cell. The split and grossly extended posterior ends were heavily stained with antibodies to tyrosinated alpha-tubulin, suggesting an accumulation of newly synthesized microtubules. A significant population of anucleate cells (zoids), apparently derived from kinetoplast-dictated cytokinesis and cell division of the G1 cells, also had extended and branched posterior ends filled with newly synthesized microtubules. This continued posterior extension of microtubules in the G1 cells and zoids suggests that CRK1 and CRK2 exert a coordinated control on G1/S passage and the limited growth of the microtubule corset toward the posterior end. This connection may provide a new insight into the mechanism of morphological maintenance of an ancient protist during its cell cycle progression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".