MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165413653 · doi:10.5194/angeo-24-1887-2006

Characteristics of night-time absorption spike events

2006· article· en· W2165413653 on OpenAlexaff
A. Aminaei, F. Honary, A. J. Kavanagh, E. Spanswick, A. Viljanen

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales Geophysicae · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRiometerSubstormElectrojetIonosphereEarth's magnetic fieldSpike (software development)PhysicsMagnetometerLocal timeGeophysicsMagnetosphereGeologyMagnetic fieldComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Sudden increases in cosmic radio noise absorption, known as spike events, have been identified as signatures of substorms in the previous studies. Using data from the IRIS (Imaging Riometer for Ionospheric Studies) at Kilpisjärvi, Finland (L~6) more than 450 night-time spike events between 1994 and 2003 have been identified. Spike events fall into four distinct categories based on their structure and the background magnetic activity as indicated by a local westward electrojet (IL index) derived from the IMAGE (International Monitor for Auroral Geomagnetic Effects) magnetometer network as well as Pi2 magnetic pulsations from SAMNET (The UK Sub-Auroral Magnetometer Network). Classifying the types of absorption spikes allows for identification of phenomena such as multiple onsets and pseudobreakups from riometer data. In addition we have studied the statistical variation of absorption spikes and their sub-classes. This includes examining the magnetic local time (MLT) distribution and the seasonal and solar-cycle variation in spike occurrence. Those that seem to represent substorm onsets show a decidedly different MLT variation to those isolated spikes that represent pseudobreakups. The occurrence of spikes during different levels of geomagnetic activity is examined using the Kp index. Wavelet analysis has been used for studying the temporal structure of spikes; also the direction of motion of spike events and localisation of spikes are presented for all events and each sub-class and results are compared with previous studies. Statistical studies are supported with X-ray images of aurora from PIXIE (The Polar Ionospheric X-ray Imaging Experiment) when available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.589
Threshold uncertainty score0.805

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales GeophysicaeSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207