Mapping white matter diffusion and cerebrovascular reactivity in carotid occlusive disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the relationship between cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) and white matter (WM) diffusion in patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusive disease. METHODS: In this exploratory observational study, 41 patients with severe stenosis or occlusion of the extracranial ICA and 12 healthy control subjects underwent CVR mapping using the fMRI response to hypercapnia. Conventional anatomic and diffusion-weighted MRI sequences were used to calculate maps of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and to exclude areas of previous ischemic injury. In all subjects, ADC was compared between WM with positive and negative CVR. In 27 patients with unilateral ICA involvement, ADC and CVR were compared between ipsilateral and contralateral WM while covarying for relevant clinical risk factors. RESULTS: In patients with bilateral disease and in the ipsilateral hemisphere of patients with unilateral disease, negative CVR was associated with increased WM ADC (p < 0.01 and p < 0.005, respectively). In patients with unilateral disease, the ipsilateral CVR deficit was correlated with the degree of hemispheric WM ADC elevation (p < 0.005). ADC elevation remained significant after correction for potential confounding risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: CVR impairment is associated with ADC elevation in normal-appearing WM of patients with severe stenosis or occlusion of the extracranial ICA. This finding is consistent with the presence of early, low-grade ischemic injury.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".