The European Union: It’s Place in the World Economy and the Impact on the International Economic Processes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Main goal of the paper is to define the European Union place in world economy and evaluate the impact on international economic processes. The article proves that in spite of the crisis and a sharp national debt problem, Europe doesn’t lose its positions. The presence of the highly developed industry, developed system of transnational corporations and banks, manufacturing of the big pat of high technology products, conducting wise policy in the R&D sphere, and high competitiveness of most of the EU countries in the world economy assured big inflows of investments in the Union economy. This had a positive impact on the level of well-being in the member countries and their social and economic development, which is confirmed by the indicators of income levels per capita and human development. The European Union remains the leading integration block, which is not only competing with the United States, Japan, and China, but also is in the lead of this race. Presence of the highly developed industry, developed system of transnational corporations and banks, production of a large part of high-technology products, and high competitiveness of most of the EU countries are proven statistically. It’s demonstrated that the appearance of this market is one of the most significant events in the modern world economy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".