MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Quaternary faulting history along the Deep Springs fault, California

2001· article· en· W2165746018 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jeffrey Lee, Charles M. Rubin, Andrew T. Calvert

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society of America Bulletin · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill UniversityUniversity of ArizonaCentral Washington UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGeological surveyGeologyCitationLibrary scienceArchaeologyHistoryPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| July 01, 2001 Quaternary faulting history along the Deep Springs fault, California Jeffrey Lee; Jeffrey Lee 1Department of Geological Sciences, Central Washington University, Ellensburg, Washington 98926, USA, and Institute for Crustal Studies, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Charles M. Rubin; Charles M. Rubin 2Department of Geological Sciences, Central Washington University, Ellensburg, Washington 98926, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Andrew Calvert Andrew Calvert 3Department of Geological Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Jeffrey Lee 1Department of Geological Sciences, Central Washington University, Ellensburg, Washington 98926, USA, and Institute for Crustal Studies, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA Charles M. Rubin 2Department of Geological Sciences, Central Washington University, Ellensburg, Washington 98926, USA Andrew Calvert 3Department of Geological Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 19 Aug 1999 Revision Received: 05 May 2000 Accepted: 24 Aug 2000 First Online: 01 Jun 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2674 Print ISSN: 0016-7606 Geological Society of America GSA Bulletin (2001) 113 (7): 855–869. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(2001)113<0855:QFHATD>2.0.CO;2 Article history Received: 19 Aug 1999 Revision Received: 05 May 2000 Accepted: 24 Aug 2000 First Online: 01 Jun 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Jeffrey Lee, Charles M. Rubin, Andrew Calvert; Quaternary faulting history along the Deep Springs fault, California. GSA Bulletin 2001;; 113 (7): 855–869. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(2001)113<0855:QFHATD>2.0.CO;2 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGSA Bulletin Search Advanced Search Abstract New geologic mapping, structural studies, geochronology, and diffusion erosion modeling along the Deep Springs fault, California, shed light on its Quaternary faulting history. The Deep Springs fault, a 26- km-long, predominantly north-northeast-striking, west-northwest−dipping normal fault bounding the eastern side of Deep Springs Valley, cuts Jurassic batholithic rocks nonconformably overlain by middle Miocene to Pleistocene stream gravels, coarse-grained sand, tuffaceous sand, unwelded to partially welded tuff, and Bishop ash, as well as Quaternary coarse- to fine- grained alluvial fan deposits. The 40Ar/39Ar geochronology yields ages of 3.09 ± 0.08 Ma for the unwelded tuff and 753 ± 4 ka for the Bishop ash. Holocene debris flows, a landslide, and recent alluvium bury the youngest fault scarp. The Deep Springs fault is characterized by multiple fault planes and fault scarps that become progressively younger toward the basin. The dip of the fault plane varies from 20° to 87° and fault-plane and striation measurements indicate an average orientation of N23E, 47NW, and N77E, 49SW, respectively. The offset of Bishop ash and underlying tuff across the Deep Springs fault indicates horizontal extension and vertical slip rates of ∼0.7 and ∼0.9 mm/yr, respectively, since the eruption of the Bishop Tuff, and ∼0.2 and ∼0.2 mm/yr, respectively, since the eruption of the unwelded tuff. If the vertical slip rate since the eruption of the Bishop Tuff has remained constant through time, then slip along the Deep Springs fault began ca. 1.7 Ma. Younger fault scarps to the west of the bedrock fault cut Quaternary deposits; scarp offset ranges from 0.8 to 17.5 m, and scarp slope angle ranges from 8° to 37°. Topographic profiling of the smallest, least eroded fault scarps, with an average surface offset of 2.7 m, indicates that these scarps developed as the result of a single earthquake and ruptured an ∼20- km-long segment of the fault. Radiocarbon analyses on detrital charcoal, located in the footwall block of one of these scarps, yield an age of 1.960 ± 0.055 ka. Diffusion erosion modeling of these fault scarps yields an elapsed time of 1.7 ± 0.5 k.y. since these fault scarps formed. Making reasonable assumptions about the depth of this earthquake and shear modulus, we estimate a moment magnitude, MW ≈ 7.0, for this earthquake. The Deep Springs fault is one of several displacement-transfer normal faults that define a zone of distributed deformation between subparallel right-lateral strike-slip faults east of the Sierra Nevada that make up the northern part of the Eastern California Shear Zone. The young age and recent earthquake activity along the Deep Springs fault are consistent with a model proposed for the kinematic evolution of this part of the Eastern California Shear Zone. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.587
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society of America BulletinSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207