Restricting sulfur amino acid intake in growing pigs challenged with lipopolysaccharides decreases plasma protein and albumin synthesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Litvak, N., Htoo, J. K. and de Lange, C. F. M. 2013. Restricting sulfur amino acid intake in growing pigs challenged with lipopolysaccharides decreases plasma protein and albumin synthesis. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 93: 505–515. Chronic subclinical levels of disease occur frequently in swine production and compromise nutrient utilization efficiency. Methionine and cysteine (M+C) are involved in the pig's response to immune system stimulation (ISS), acting as substrates for the synthesis of compounds involved in the immune response, such as acute phase proteins (APP). This study was conducted to determine the impact of ISS with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and M+C intake (high vs. low; 4.0 vs. 2.2 g d−1) on the fractional synthesis rate (FSR) of plasma albumin and fibrinogen, as well as protein in plasma and various tissues of starter pigs. Fifteen pigs (9.8±1.4 kg body weight) were allotted to one of three treatments: (1) Control (LPS− and high M+C), (2) LPS+ and high M+C, or (3) LPS+ and low M+C. Pigs were given intramuscular injections of increasing doses of LPS 1 and 3 d before determining FSR using an intravenous infusion of a flooding dose of L-[ring−1H5]-phenylalanine. Plasma levels of APP were not affected by the LPS challenge (P>0.10); only plasma albumin levels decreased with reduced M+C intake (P=0.02). Total plasma protein FSR was increased during the LPS challenge (50.3 vs. 56.9% d−1, SEM = 1.6; P=0.01). Albumin FSR was not affected by an LPS challenge (P>0.10), but decreased with reduced M+C intake during the LPS challenge (49.5 vs. 41.9% d−1, SEM = 1.6; P=0.005). Spleen protein FSR tended to increase during the LPS challenge (P=0.08). There were no treatment effects on protein FSR in liver, small intestine, loin or plasma fibrinogen (P>0.10). Restricting M+C intake during a LPS challenge decreases albumin synthesis and tends to reduce plasma protein synthesis, implicating M+C as important nutrients involved in the immune response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".