Paternal Exposure to Cyclophosphamide Alters Cell-Cell Contacts and Activation of Embryonic Transcription in the Preimplantation Rat Embryo1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Paternal exposure to chronic low doses of cyclophosphamide, an anticancer agent, results in aberrant embryonic development of the progeny. We hypothesized that paternal exposure to cyclophosphamide disturbs zygotic gene activity regulating proper progression through preimplantation development and that this disturbance results in improper cell-cell interactions. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed cell-cell interactions and the expression of cytoskeletal elements in preimplantation embryos sired by male rats gavaged with saline or 6 mg kg(-1) day(-1) cyclophosphamide for 5 wk. Embryos from control litters had 4-12 cells on Day 2 of gestation; cell-cell contacts were observed consistently. Embryos from litters sired by cyclophosphamide-treated males were frequently abnormal and had lower cell numbers and decreased cell-cell contacts. Steady state concentrations of the mRNAs for cell adhesion molecules (cadherins and connexin 43) and structural proteins (beta-actin, collagen, and vimentin) were low in two- and four-cell control embryos; expression increased dramatically by the eight-cell stage. In contrast, embryos sired by cyclophosphamide-treated males displayed the highest expression of most trancripts at the two-cell stage. In parallel with the mRNA profiles, E-cadherin immmunoreactivity was nearly absent in two-cell control embryos and was strong by the eight-cell stage; immunoreactivity in embryos sired by drug-treated fathers was strong at the two-cell stage but absent at later stages. Thus, drug exposure of the paternal genome led to dysregulated expression of structural elements and decreased cell interactions during preimplantation embryonic development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".