MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165828377 · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3007513

Making Prospective Registration of Observational Research a Reality

2014· article· en· W2165828377 on OpenAlexaff
Rafael Dal‐Ré, John P. A. Ioannidis, Michael B. Bracken, Patricia A. Buffler, An‐Wen Chan, Eduardo L. Franco, Carlo La Vecchia, Elisabete Weiderpass

Bibliographic record

VenueScience Translational Medicine · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHealth, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityWomen's College Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservational studyMedicineMedical physicsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The vast majority of health-related observational studies are not prospectively registered and the advantages of registration have not been fully appreciated. Nonetheless, international standards require approval of study protocols by an independent ethics committee before the study can begin. We suggest that there is an ethical and scientific imperative to publicly preregister key information from newly approved protocols, which should be required by funders. Ultimately, more complete information may be publicly available by disclosing protocols, analysis plans, data sets, and raw data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.743
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.864
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Reproducibility · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.7430.864
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.004
Bibliometrics0.0070.013
Science and technology studies0.0040.020
Scholarly communication0.0250.042
Open science0.0100.026
Research integrity0.0180.037
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.282
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainReproducibility
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations127
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience Translational MedicineSame topicHealth, Environment, Cognitive AgingFrench-language works237,207