MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165866752 · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.173.12.7135

Cutting Edge: Cbl-b: One of the Key Molecules Tuning CD28- and CTLA-4-Mediated T Cell Costimulation

2004· article· en· W2165866752 on OpenAlexafffund
Dongdong Li, István Gál, Csaba Vermes, Maria-Luisa Alegre, Anita S. Chong, Lieping Chen, Qing Shao, Vyacheslava Adarichev, Xuemei Xu, Tamás Koreny, Katalin Mikecz, Alison Finnegan, Tibor T. Glant, Jian Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and B-cell Immunology
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin DiseasesUniversity of TorontoBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsCD28Cell biologyKey (lock)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionCTLA-4T cellChemistryComputer scienceBiologyImmunologyTelecommunicationsImmune systemComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cbl-b negatively regulates CD28-dependent T cell activation. In this report, we tested the hypothesis that CD28 and CTLA-4 have opposite roles in tuning T cell activation threshold by controlling the levels of Cbl-b protein expression. We demonstrate that CD28 costimulation potentiates TCR-induced Cbl-b degradation, whereas CTLA-4-B7 interaction is required for Cbl-b re-expression. In support of this finding, Cbl-b expression in CTLA-4 knockout (KO) T cells is significantly reduced, and treating CTLA-4KO mice with human CTLA-4Ig to block CD28-B7 interaction restores Cbl-b expression on T cells. Furthermore, CD28 and CTLA-4 costimulatory effects are compromised in Cbl-bKO T cells. These observations indicate that CD28 and CTLA-4 tightly regulate Cbl-b expression which is critical for establishing the threshold for T cell activation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.535

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations116
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyFrench-language works237,207