MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165886788 · doi:10.1186/1532-429x-12-s1-p179

Characterizing myocardial edema and hemorrhage using T2, T2*, and diastolic wall thickness post acute myocardial infarction

2010· article· en· W2165886788 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad I. Zia, Nilesh R. Ghugre, Gideon Paul, Jeffrey A. Stainsby, Venkat Ramanan, Kim A. Connelly, Graham A. Wright, Alexander Dick

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAngiologyMyocardial infarctionEdemaCardiologyFast spin echoMagnetic resonance imagingSpiral (railway)Internal medicineNuclear medicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our goal was to demonstrate myocardial edema using T2 spiral and diastolic wall thickness (DWT) and myocardial hemorrhage using T2* in patients post acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at 2 early time intervals. Enhanced T2, often identified with area at risk (AAR), combined with consideration of T2* and DWT may facilitate interpretation of potentially complex patterns of myocardial damage and tissue response infarction zones. Patients were enrolled post AMI (creatine kinase >500 IU/L) and underwent CMR on a GE Signa Excite, 1.5 T scanner with a 8-channel receive coil at 48 hours and 3 weeks post MI. T2 maps were computed from a previously validated cardiac-gated spiral imaging sequence with T2 preparations yielding TEs = 2.9, 24.3, 88.2, 184.2 ms to assess myocardial edema. The T2* sequence was a multiecho acquisition with 8 echoes (between 1.4 and 12.7 ms) acquired at TR = 14.6 ms. T2-weighted imaging using a breath-hold triple IR fast spin echo sequence and delayed hyperenhancement (DHE) were also performed. Seven patients (mean age: 54.5 years; 6 males, 1 female; 5 right coronary artery and 2 left circumflex artery percutaneous coronary interventions) have been enrolled. At 48 hours, both the mean T2 (54.4 ms vs 40.6 ms; p < 0.01) and mean DWT (7.9 mm vs 6.4 mm; p = 0.01) were significantly higher in the infarcted segment (IS) compared to a remote segment (RS). Figure 1 demonstrates the evolution of T2 and T2* behavior over time. At 48 hours, panel-a demonstrates a modestly increased T2 of 51 ms in the IS suggesting myocardial edema, relative to RS with a T2 of 40 ms. However, there is also evidence of myocardial hemorrhage on T2*-weighted images (panel-b, arrow) along with microvascular obstruction on DHE (panel-c). The difference in DWT between IS and RS was 3.3 mm. At 3 weeks, the T2 in the IS increased to 58 ms compared to a RS T2 of 40 ms (panel-d). At this time, there is evidence of less hemorrhage on T2*-weighted images (panel-e, arrow), a reduced area of microvascular obstruction on DHE (panel-f) and a reduced difference in DWT of 0.7 mm between IS and RS, Figure 1 . Figure 1 Assessing the presence and evolution of edema and myocardial hemorrhage early post AMI demonstrates distinct patterns. If myocardial hemorrhage is present, then early scans are affected by the competing effects of T2*, counteracting an increased T2 signal. This may be important in accurately quantifying AAR and identifying those patients most likely to suffer deleterious left ventricular remodeling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonanceSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207