MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165948205 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2003.1226042

Low power programmable front-end for a multichannel neural recording interface

2004· article· en· W2165948205 on OpenAlexaff
Benoit Gosselin, V. Simard, Mohamad Sawan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreamplifierCMOSPhase marginElectrical engineeringFront and back endsElectronic engineeringDynamic rangeAnalog front-endComputer scienceVoltageCutoff frequencyLow-power electronicsEngineeringPower (physics)PhysicsOperational amplifierAmplifierPower consumption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper a programmable gain preamplification front-end for a fully implantable multichannel data acquisition system (IMDAS) that is dedicated for chronic neural signal recording is proposed. This application calls for very low power and low voltage circuit techniques. To satisfy these constraints, the preamplifier is designed in 0.18 /spl mu/m CMOS technology and all employed transistors operate in weak inversion. To maximize the dynamic range of the recorded signals, the preamplifier's gain is set by a 4-bit digital-to-analog converter (DAC). This DAC is used to tune the bias currents of a variable transconductor cell in order to vary its DC gain. The simulation of the whole proposed module gives a maximum power consumption of 530 nW at a supply voltage of 0.9 V. The circuit provides a maximum gain of 47 dB, has a cutoff frequency of 2.65 KHz and presents an input-referred noise of 7.65 /spl mu/Vrms which is sufficiently low to meet the required precision. In addition, the phase margin is higher than 50/spl deg/ on the entire gain range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.631

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207