Regulation of Leptin Receptor Expression in Human Polarized Caco-2/15 Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Leptin receptors (LEPR) are expressed in intestinal epithelial cells from the duodenum to the colon. Since their role is fundamental for the proper control of nutrient absorption, mucus secretion and mucosa renewal, the regulation of LEPR expression is for the first time investigated as a function of various potential effectors. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Fully differentiated Caco-2/15 cells were incubated for 24 hours with nutrients [carbohydrates, fatty acids (FA), amino acids and sterols], hormones (leptin, insulin, hydrocortisone and epithelial growth factor), inflammatory agents (Interferon-γ, LPS, TNF-α), and PPAR agonists (rosiglitazone and WY14643). Levels of LEPR mRNA and protein expressions were measured by RT-PCR and Western blots, respectively. RESULTS: Long (219.1) and short (219.3) isoforms of the LEPR were detected in Caco-2/15 cells, while absence of the isoform 219.2 was noted. Their gene expression was modulated by carbohydrates, FA, PPAR agonists, biliary salts, insulin and leptin itself. On the other hand, LEPR protein expression was modulated by FA, cholesterol, biliary salts, PPAR agonists and insulin. Interestingly, the same effectors may have opposite effects on the short and the long LEPR isoforms, as well as on mRNA and protein levels. Finally, Caco-2/15 cells were found to be sensitive to the effector location, i.e. apical or basolateral compartment. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results suggest that (i) the expression of LEPR in Caco-2/15 cell line is not constitutive; (ii) the agents present in the apical or basolateral medium have different effects on LEPR mRNA and/or protein levels; and (iii) short and long isoforms of LEPR follow different patterns of regulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".