Development of a <i> <scp>P</scp> seudomonas syringae– <scp>E</scp> utrema salsugineum </i> pathosystem to investigate disease resistance in a stress tolerant extremophile model plant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To improve the ability to understand how plants respond to multiple and/or concurrent stresses, disease resistance was investigated in E utrema salsugineum , an extremophile model plant that is highly tolerant of abiotic stress. Compared to A rabidopsis (Col‐0), both Y ukon and S handong E utrema accessions exhibit increased resistance to P seudomonas syringae pv . tomato DC 3000 (Pst) and pv. maculicola (Psm), with S handong E utrema exhibiting greater resistance to Pst than Y ukon Eutrema . RT ‐ PCR of the EsPR1 ( Pathogenesis‐related 1 ) defence marker gene confirmed RNA ‐Seq data that healthy S handong E utrema constitutively expresses EsPR1 . The data suggests that S handong E utrema exists in a highly primed state of defence preparedness, as it displays heightened resistance compared to defence‐primed natural accessions of A rabidopsis (Can‐0, Bur‐0). Pathogen‐triggered PR 1 expression was delayed in Y ukon E utrema ; however, these plants were resistant to Pst suggesting that Y ukon E utrema employs a PR 1 ‐independent mechanism to resist Pst. This study demonstrates that E utrema is an excellent model to investigate biotic stress tolerance. The E utrema– P . syringae pathosystem will facilitate future studies to understand how this extremophile tolerates both abiotic and biotic stress, and will allow exploration of the interplay of these responses to inform efforts to improve stress tolerance in crops.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".