Effects of an oral health program on the occurrence of oral candidosis in a long‐term care facility
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of a preventive oral health program on the prevalence of oral candidosis in 237 frail or dependent residents in a long-term care facility. Half of the residents were included in an experimental group which benefited from a preventive oral hygiene program including instruction of the carers and implementation of a recall program for professional oral hygiene care. METHODS: Intraoral examinations and yeast cultures from the oral mucosa and the fitting denture surface were carried out at baseline and 18 months later. The outgrowth of yeast was estimated on Oricult-N dip slides using the scale: no growth; 1-20 colonies; 21-100 colonies; >100 colonies. RESULTS: At baseline (n = 237) and at 18 months (n = 159) the experimental and the control groups were similar with regard to the residents' distribution by age, sex, dental and prosthetic status and prevalence of denture stomatitis. The 78 residents lost had the same baseline characteristics as the survivors, except for being older. In the experimental group the severity of the inflammation of the palate decreased (P = 0.005) as well as the prevalence of glossitis (P = 0.005). At baseline high yeast scores from the mucosa (>20) were observed in about 50% of the residents in the experimental as well as the control group. At 18 months this figure was 23.4% for the experimental and 48.7% for the control group (P = 0.001). There was also a reduction of the number of residents with positive cultures and the denture yeast scores at 18 months in the experimental group (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that the preventive program was effective in reducing the colonization of the oral mucosa and dentures by Candida and thereby improving the health of the oral mucosa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".