Fiber‐Like Micelles from the Crystallization‐Driven Self‐Assembly of Poly(3‐heptylselenophene)‐<i>block</i>‐Polystyrene
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The crystallization‐driven self‐assembly (CDSA) of crystalline‐coil polyselenophene diblock copolymers represents a facile approach to nanofibers with distinct optoelectronic properties relative to those of their polythiophene analogs. The synthesis of an asymmetric diblock copolymer with a crystallizable, π‐conjugated poly(3‐heptylselenophene) (P3C7Se) block and an amorphous polystyrene (PS) coblock is described. CDSA was performed in solvents selective for the PS block. Based on transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis, P3C7Se 18 ‐ b ‐PS 125 formed very long (up to 5 μm), highly aggregated nanofibers in n ‐butyl acetate ( n BuOAc) whereas shorter (ca. 500 nm) micelles of low polydispersity were obtained in cyclohexane. The micelle core widths in both solvents determined from TEM analysis (≈ 8 nm) were commensurate with fully‐extended P3C7Se 18 chains (estimated length = 7.1 nm). Atomic force microscopy (AFM) analysis provided characterization of the micelle cross‐section including the PS corona (overall micelle width ≈ 60 nm). The crystallinity of the micelle cores was probed by UV–vis and photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy and wide‐angle X‐ray scattering (WAXS).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it