Interval type-II fuzzy anisotropic diffusion algorithm for speckle noise reduction in optical coherence tomography images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel speckle noise reduction algorithm based on a combination of Anisotropic Diffusion (AD) filtering and Interval Type-II fuzzy system was developed for reducing speckle noise in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) images. Unlike regular AD, the Interval Type-II fuzzy based AD algorithm considers the uncertainty in the calculated diffusion coefficient and appropriate adjustments to the coefficient are made. The new algorithm offers flexibility in optimizing the trade-off between the two image metrics: signal-to-noise (SNR) and Edginess, which are directly related to the structure of the imaged object. Application of the Interval Type-II fuzzy AD algorithm to OCT tomograms acquired in-vivo from a human finger tip and human retina show reduction in the speckle noise with very little edge blurring and about 13 dB and 7 dB image SNR improvement respectively. Comparison with Wiener, Adaptive Lee and regular Anisotropic Diffusion filters, applied to the same images, demonstrates the superior performance of the fuzzy Type-II AD algorithm in terms image SNR and edge preservation metrics improvement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".