Different signal transduction pathways are involved during human sperm capacitation induced by biological and pharmacological agents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human sperm capacitation involves complex signal transduction mechanisms during which double phosphorylation of the threonine-glutamine-tyrosine motif (P-Thr-Glu-Tyr-P) occurs in some sperm proteins. The objective of this study was to investigate the regulation of this process. Fetal cord serum ultrafiltrate (FCSu), follicular fluid ultrafiltrate (FFu), progesterone and a combination of N(6),2'-O-dibutyryl cAMP (dbcAMP; cell permeant analogue of cAMP) and 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX; phosphodiesterase inhibitor) were used as inducers of capacitation alone or in combination with inhibitors of protein kinase A (H89), protein kinase C (chelerythrine), protein tyrosine kinase (tyrphostin A47, PP2) and of dual specificity kinase (MEK-like kinases; PD98059). The level of P-Thr-Glu-Tyr-P in sperm proteins of 80 and 105 kDa during capacitation induced by FCSu, FFu and progesterone was regulated by a similar signal transduction pathway and involved receptor type protein tyrosine kinase and dual specificity kinase (MEK or MEK-like) but not protein kinase A or C. However, the level of P-Thr-Glu-Tyr-P in these sperm proteins during capacitation induced by dbcAMP+IBMX was mainly mediated through protein kinase A and C and receptor type protein tyrosine kinase, but not by dual specificity kinase. In conclusion, human sperm capacitation induced by some biological and pharmacological agents is regulated through very different signal transduction pathways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".