MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166096291 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450810609

Experimental Studies on Hydration of Partially Sulphated CFBC Ash

2003· article· en· W2166096291 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yinghai Wu, Edward J. Anthony, Lufei Jia

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRecycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLimeFly ashScanning electron microscopeCalcium hydroxideMaterials sciencePhase (matter)HydroxideChemical engineeringCementChemistryMineralogyMetallurgyInorganic chemistryComposite materialOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The hydration of partially‐sulphated fluidized bed combustor (FBC) ash with water was carried out at laboratory scale. The bottom ash fractions and the as‐received fly ash were hydrated for different lengths of time, at different temperatures between 5°C and 80°C. The free lime and calcium hydroxide content in the samples were analyzed before and after the hydration process. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with an energy dispersive X‐ray system (EDX) was employed to investigate the physical characteristics of the samples. X‐ray diffractograms (XRD) were used to obtain information on the phase composition. The current results show that, during the hydration treatment, the unreacted CaO in the partially‐sulphated material can be almost quantitatively converted to Ca(OH) 2 but that the free lime content is not constant. It is also clear that effectiveness of the hydration depends on hydration time and temperature. In addition, the behaviour of different particle size fractions is different and there is evidence that the hydration of CaO is not the only reaction occurring in this system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicRecycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials productionFrench-language works237,207