MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166099780 · doi:10.1351/pac200476010123

Dynamics and structure of an amphiphilic triblock copolymer of styrene and 5-(N,N-diethylamino) isoprene in selective solvents

2004· article· en· W2166099780 on OpenAlexaff
Izabel C. Riegel‐Vidotti, F. M. de Bittencourt, O. Terrau, Adi Eisenberg, César Liberato Petzhold, Dimitrios Samios

Bibliographic record

VenuePure and Applied Chemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCopolymerChemistryHydrodynamic radiusRadius of gyrationPolymer chemistryIsopreneTolueneSolventStyrenePolystyreneSolvationPolymerSolvent effectsDynamic light scatteringTheta solventMethyl methacrylateOrganic chemistryChemical engineeringNanoparticle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Solution properties of a highly asymmetric aminofunctionalized triblock copolymer of 5-( N,N -diethylamino)isoprene and styrene were investigated in dilute regime. Toluene, THF, 1,4-dioxane, or DMF were used to prepare the solutions. It was found that the solvent selectivity for one or both block affects the copolymer solution behavior as reflected by the calculated parameters through light-scattering techniques: weight-averaged, molecular-weight, radius of gyration, translational diffusion coefficient, and hydrodynamic radius. According to what was determined, the quality of the polymer-solvent interactions decreases in the order: toluene, THF, 1,4-dioxane, and DMF. After quaternization with dimethyl sulfate, the triblock copolymer consisted of a polystyrene (PS) block with short poly[5-( N,N,N -diethylmethylammonium)isoprene][methyl sulfate] block at both chain ends, shows a better solvation in polar solvents. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to characterize the crew-cut aggregates prepared from the quaternized copolymer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.769

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePure and Applied ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207