MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comparison of the Mechanical Performance of Ossiculoplasty Using a Prosthetic Malleus-to-Stapes Head with a Tympanic Membrane-to-Stapes Head Assembly in a Human Cadaveric Middle Ear Model

2004· article· en· W2166141977 on OpenAlexaff
Manohar Bance, David P. Morris, Rene G. VanWijhe, Michael Kiefte, W. Robert J. Funnell

Bibliographic record

VenueOtology & Neurotology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEar Surgery and Otitis Media
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStapesMalleusFootplateIncusMiddle earMedicineCadaveric spasmTympanum (architecture)OssiclesAnatomyLaser Doppler vibrometerProsthesisSurgeryTympanMaterials scienceTympanosclerosisEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

HYPOTHESIS: Ossiculoplasty using prosthetic reconstruction with a malleus assembly to the stapes head will result in better transmission of vibrations from the eardrum to the stapes footplate than reconstruction with a tympanic membrane assembly to the stapes head. Both types of reconstruction will be affected by tension of the prosthesis. BACKGROUND: Theories (and some clinical studies) that the shape of the normal tympanic membrane is important suggest that prosthetic reconstruction to the malleus performs better than reconstruction to the tympanic membrane. This has not been previously tested by directly measuring vibration responses in the human ear. Our previous work suggests that tympanic membrane assembly to the stapes head type prostheses performed best under low tension. This had not been previously tested for malleus assembly to the stapes head type prostheses. METHODS: Hydroxyapatite prostheses were used to reconstruct a missing incus defect in a fresh cadaveric human ear model. Two types of prostheses were used, one from the stapes head to the malleus (malleus assembly to the stapes head), the other from the stapes head to the tympanic membrane (tympanic membrane assembly to the stapes head). Stapes footplate center responses were measured using a laser Doppler vibrometer in response to calibrated acoustic frequency sweeps. RESULTS: Tension had a very significant effect on both types of prostheses in the lower frequencies. Loose tension was best overall. The malleus assembly to the stapes head type prostheses consistently performed better than the tympanic membrane assembly to the stapes head type prostheses when stratified for tension. CONCLUSION: Tension has a significant effect on prosthesis function. Malleus assembly to the stapes head type prostheses generally result in better transmission of vibrations to the stapes footplate than tympanic membrane assembly to the stapes head type prostheses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOtology & NeurotologySame topicEar Surgery and Otitis MediaFrench-language works237,207