Effects of the Vascular Disrupting Agent ZD6126 on Interstitial Fluid Pressure and Cell Survival in Tumors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) is elevated in tumors due to abnormal vasculature, lack of lymphatic drainage, and alterations in the tumor interstitium. ZD6126 is a tubulin-binding agent that selectively disrupts tumor vasculature resulting in tumor necrosis. This study examined the effect of ZD6126 on tumor IFP and the response of tumors with different IFP levels to ZD6126. Pretreatment IFP was measured using the wick-in-needle method in tumors (murine KHT-C and human CaSki) growing i.m. in the hind legs of mice. Mice were treated i.p. with a single dose of ZD6126 (100 or 200 mg/kg) and posttreatment IFP measurements were made. Blood flow imaging was conducted using Doppler optical coherence tomography, whereas oxygen partial pressure was measured using a fiber optic probe. Clonogenic assays were done to determine tumor cell survival. In KHT-C tumors, IFP dropped significantly at 1 hour posttreatment, returned to pretreatment values at 3 hours, and then declined to approximately 25% of the pretreatment values by 72 hours. In CaSki tumors, the IFP decreased progressively, beginning at 1 hour, to approximately 30% of pretreatment values by 72 hours. Clonogenic cell survival data indicated that ZD6126 was less effective in tumors with high IFP values (>25 mm Hg). Vascular disrupting agents, such as ZD6126, can affect IFP levels and initial IFP levels may predict tumor response to these agents. The higher cell survival in high IFP tumors may reflect greater microregional blood flow limitations in these tumors and reduced access of the drug to the target endothelial cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".