Leukotrienes and isocyanate‐induced asthma: a pilot study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The role of leukotrienes (LTs) in the pathophysiology of isocyanate-induced asthma is not well known. OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize the type of airway inflammation induced by exposure to isocyanates and to investigate whether exposure to isocyanates induced an increase in LT receptor cysteinyl leukotriene ((CysLT)(1), CysLT(2) and leukotriene B(4) receptor (BLT(1))) expression, as well as a release of LT (LTC(4) and leukotriene B(4) (LTB(4))) and IL-8 in both asthmatics with isocyanate-induced asthma and healthy subjects. METHODS: We investigated eight subjects with isocyanate-induced asthma and eight healthy subjects. Both groups underwent specific inhalation challenges to isocyanates in the laboratory. Induced sputum was collected before and after exposure to isocyanates. CysLT(1), CysLT(2) and BLT(1) expression was assessed by flow cytometry, whereas LTC(4), LTB(4) and IL-8 were measured in the sputum supernatants by enzyme immunoassay. RESULTS: Exposure to isocyanates induced an increase in sputum neutrophils only in subjects with occupational asthma. There was a significant increase in CysLT(1) and BLT(1) receptor expression, as well as a release of LTB(4) and IL-8 after exposure to isocyanates compared with the baseline, only in subjects with isocyanate-induced asthma, whereas there was no increase in LTC(4). Exposure to isocyanates did not induce any change in LT receptor expression nor in the levels of LTC(4), LTB(4) and IL-8, in healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: The neutrophilia observed after exposure to isocyanates is likely to be related to the release of LTB(4), probably enhanced by the increased expression of BLT(1) on neutrophils as well as by the release of IL-8. The significance of the increase of CysLT1 receptor expression on neutrophils is unknown and needs further investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".