Mouse FLRT2 Interacts with the Extracellular and Intracellular Regions of FGFR2
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) signaling is known to be critical in mediating key developmental events during craniofacial development. Recent evidence suggests that members of the Fibronectin (F) Leucine (L) Rich (R) Transmembrane (T), FLRT, family modulate FGF signaling. FLRT2 has a highly specific pattern of expression during craniofacial development, in close relationship with FGFR2. We therefore characterized FLRT2/FGFR2 interactions in the context of craniofacial development and showed, by co-immunoprecipitation and GST pulldown assays with embryonic craniofacial tissue lysates, that FLRT2 interacted with FGFR2. Yeast two-hybrid assays further showed that the intracellular regions of both proteins interacted in addition to the interactions in the extracellular portions. The extracellular Leucine Rich Repeats domain of FLRT2 contributed to the interactions with the extracellular regions of FGFR2. Interactions in the intracellular regions of the 2 proteins were mediated by the C-tail domain in FLRT2. Furthermore, cells stably transfected with FLRT2 shRNAs or FLRT2 cDNA exhibited a concomitant decrease and increase, respectively, in FGFR2 protein, mRNA, and ERK phosphorylation levels, suggesting a positive feedback regulatory loop of FLRT2 on FGF signaling in craniofacial tissues. We propose that FLRT2-FGFR2 interactions represent a potential mechanism for regulation of FGF signaling by FLRT2 during craniofacial development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it