Ontogenetic variation in antipredator behavior of Iberian rock lizards (<i>Lacerta monticola</i>): effects of body-size-dependent thermal-exchange rates and costs of refuge use
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In lizards, ontogenetic changes in body size affect thermal-exchange rates. This simple physical property may have consequences for thermoregulation, and also for antipredator behavior. We examined how ontogenetic changes in body mass affect rates of heating and cooling of the lizard Lacerta monticola, confirming the general result obtained for other lizards. We further analyzed the differences between juveniles and adults in approach distances to a simulated predator and in time to emerge from refuges. Juvenile lizards have a lower absolute running speed, making them more vulnerable to predation. However, in contrast to results expected from optimal-escape theory, approach distances were shorter for juveniles than for adults. Juveniles may be confident in their small size and only flee when the probability of being detected is high. On the other hand, differences in thermal properties might affect costs of refuge use. Thus, juveniles might delay fleeing because their costs of hiding are higher, as they cool faster than adults. Differences in thermal costs may also explain the juveniles' shorter times of emergence from refuges. Because of the behavioral adjustments involved in antipredator behavior, the physiological costs of reaching a low body temperature in refuges probably do not differ between age classes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".