Correspondence between <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> antibodies and urea breath test results in a US – Mexico birth cohort
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The uncertain accuracy of methods for detecting Helicobacter pylori infection in young children complicates research on this infection in early life. The aim of the present report was to describe the correspondence between positive serology and positive urea breath test (UBT) in children followed from age 0 to 24 months in the Pasitos Cohort Study, conducted along the US-Mexico border at El Paso and Juarez. Children were recruited before birth during 1998-2000 and examined at target ages of 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. H. pylori infection was detected using an enzyme immunoassay for serum immunoglobulin G antibodies and the (13)C-urea breath test corrected for age-dependent variation in CO(2) production. Of 472 children, 125 had one or more positive UBT results and 46 had one or more positive serology results. The prevalence of H. pylori infection at target ages of 6, 12, 18 and 24 months was 7%, 14%, 16% and 19%, respectively, by UBT and 8%, 2%, 3% and 3%, respectively, by serology. Few (<1%) of those tested on both tests were positive on both at any age. Among UBT-positive children, 6% were concurrently seropositive and 6% became seropositive later. Because UBT positivity cut points were selected to minimise false positives, these results suggest that H. pylori infection occurred frequently in this cohort, but rarely produced detectable antibodies. For clinical or epidemiological investigations, serology should not be used as the sole method for detecting H. pylori infection in children aged 2 years or less.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".