MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166448227 · doi:10.3168/jds.2011-4347

Short communication: Genetic parameters for measures of calf health in a population of Holstein calves in New York State

2011· article· en· W2166448227 on OpenAlexaffabout
L. Henderson, F. Miglior, A. Sewalem, J. Wormuth, D.F. Kelton, A. Robinson, K.E. Leslie

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal health and immunology
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Guelph
FundersHolstein Association USAU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsBiologyPopulationAnimal scienceGeneticsMedicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objectives of this study were to estimate the genetic parameters of preweaning undifferentiated bovine respiratory disease (BRD), umbilical diseases (UMB), and bloat (BLT) for a population of Holstein calves from New York State, as well as to associate the estimated breeding values determined in the current study with traits from ongoing genetic evaluations used in Canada and the United States. Data were recorded for 7,372 heifer calves at a commercial rearing facility in New York State, from arrival at 1 to 7d of age for the duration of stay at the facility. Performance and disease up to weaning and mortality before and after weaning were recorded. The 3 traits of interest, BRD, UMB, and BLT, were scored as 0 or 1 and analyzed using a multivariate linear sire model. The model included fixed effects of arrival weight, serum total protein, weaning weight, and season and year of birth; herd and sire were included as random effects. The heritabilities of the 3 health traits of interest were estimated at 0.09 for BRD, 0.14 for UMB, and 0.04 for BLT. The genetic correlation between the calf health traits BRD and BLT was 0.62. Correlations between BRD and UMB and between BLT and UMB were close to zero. Breeding values were estimated for the 3 calf health traits and correlated with routinely evaluated traits from Canadian and US genetic evaluations (correlations ranged from -0.42 to 0.32). Significant differences existed among Holstein sires for calf health during the preweaning period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.204

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.272
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.120 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicAnimal health and immunologyFrench-language works237,207