MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166463759 · doi:10.1094/pdis.2003.87.10.1267a

First Report of A1 Mating Type of <i>Phytophthora ramorum</i> in North America

2003· article· en· W2166463759 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogens and Resistance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyPhytophthora ramorumMating typeBotanyPotato dextrose agarVeterinary medicineHorticulturePhytophthoraAgarGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phytophthora ramorum is known in Europe and the western United States (1). In Europe, it is found in nurseries and landscape plantings. In the United States, it has been confined to coastal forests, and in California, it is found in a few horticultural nurseries. All European isolates tested have been A1 mating type, while all North American isolates were A2 mating type (2). Amplified fragment length polymorphism markers also indicated that the populations on the two continents are distinct, and nearly all North American isolates are from one clone (Kelly Ivors, unpublished). In June 2003, P. ramorum was isolated from diseased Viburnum and Pieris spp. cultivars from a Clackamas County nursery in northern Oregon and diseased Camellia sp. cultivar from a Jackson County nursery in southern Oregon. Representative isolates were submitted to the American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA. As part of the effort to determine the origin of these new infestations, we tested the nursery isolates for mating type. Seven Oregon nursery isolates, three Oregon forest isolates (from the predominant North American clone), and two European isolates were paired. Agar plugs from 3-day-old colonies were placed in close proximity on carrot agar plates, and then the plates were examined for oogonia after 3 and 10 days as advised by C. M. Brasier (personal communication). Oogonia and antheridia typical of P. ramorum (2) formed when isolates from the Clackamas County nursery were paired with the Oregon forest isolates and also when isolates from the Jackson County nursery were paired with the European isolates. Gametangia also formed in pairings between Oregon forest isolates and European isolates, but not in any other combinations. We developed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers for four microsatellite loci and determined allele sizes for the same set of isolates (unpublished). Microsatellite alleles of the Clackamas County isolates were identical to the European tester isolates, and alleles of the Jackson County isolates were identical to the Oregon forest isolates. These results indicate that the recent Oregon nursery infestations are of separate origins. The Clackamas County isolates are A1 mating type and have microsatellite alleles like the European testers, but according to shipping records, the nursery has received no host nursery stock directly from Europe. However, host nursery stock has been received from a Canadian nursery. The Jackson County isolates are of A2 mating type and have microsatellite alleles like the forest isolates of Oregon, which is consistent with the reported origin of these plants from a California nursery. These preliminary microsatellite results need to be validated against a larger isolate set but are congruent with the mating type results. The Oregon nursery infestations highlight the dangers of unregulated or underregulated transport of host nursery stock from infested areas to noninfested areas. All host plants from infested nursery blocks at the affected Oregon nurseries have been destroyed by incineration, and a monitoring program has been implemented. Other host nursery stock on site has been taken "off-sale" pending verification that it is disease free, per the United States Department of Agriculture, APHIS requirements. References: (1) J. M. Davidson et al. On-line publication. doi:10.1094/PHP-2003-0707-01-DG. Plant Health Progress, 2003. (2) S. Werres et al. Mycol. Res. 105:1155, 2001.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.115

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it