MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166500777 · doi:10.1093/ejo/cjt090

Radiographic assessment of external root resorption associated with jackscrew-based maxillary expansion therapies: a systematic review

2013· review· en· W2166500777 on OpenAlexaff
Darren Forst, Simrit Nijjar, Yasser Khaled, Manuel O. Lagravère, Carlos Flores‐Mir

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Orthodontics · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDentistryCINAHLRadiographyMEDLINERoot resorptionOrthodonticsResorptionRadiologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in adolescents and young adults if jackscrew-based maxillary expansion therapies result in external root resorption as measured in vivo via any radiological method. METHODS: The authors conducted a systematic search of several electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Evidence Based Medicine Reviews, LILACS) with the assistance of a senior librarian specialized in Health Sciences database searches through 25 August 2013, as well as a limited grey-literature search (Google Scholar). Human, in vivo studies of adolescents or young adults with transverse maxillary deficiency undergoing non-surgical maxillary expansion therapy through the use of a jackscrew-based maxillary expander with a radiographical assessment of root resorption were selected for full article review. Additionally, manual searches of reference lists of relevant articles were completed to identify additional publications not identified by electronic searches. The lowest levels of evidence accepted for inclusion were case-control studies or consecutively treated series of cases. Two authors independently reviewed and extracted data from selected studies. RESULTS: A total of 83 original articles were identified from the electronic database and limited grey-literature searches. Once selection criteria were applied, only three articles satisfied all inclusion criteria, and individual analysis of the selected articles was undertaken. CONCLUSIONS: Two-dimensional periapical radiographs do not fully reveal the amount of external root resorption associated with maxillary expansion therapy, except for frank apical root resorption. Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography radiography displays statistically significant root volume loss associated with maxillary expansion therapy. However, when considering volume-loss percentages, no statistical significance was found.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.006
Bibliometrics0.0140.012
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of OrthodonticsSame topicOrthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsFrench-language works237,207