Management of Hypertriglyceridemia in Patients Receiving Interferon for Malignant Melanoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe 3 cases of hypertriglyceridemia associated with the use of interferon alfa (IFN-alpha) for the treatment of malignant melanoma and propose a management plan for dyslipidemia associated with interferon therapy. CASE SUMMARIES: Three case reports of hypertriglyceridemia with or without elevation of total cholesterol level associated with the use of adjuvant IFN-alpha for the treatment of malignant melanoma are described. These patients received IFN-alpha-based adjuvant therapy with doses ranging from 5-20 million units/m(2) for 1-2 years' duration. The onset and severity of dyslipidemia appeared to occur randomly. Pre-existing cardiovascular disorders did not seem to play a role. The patients were treated with atorvastatin, gemfibrozil, and a combination of lovastatin with niacin, depending on their lipid panel results. DISCUSSION: Based on our case reports and published data, hypertriglyceridemia is more frequently associated with longer duration of interferon therapy, although the time of onset is not clearly defined. Presence or absence of baseline dyslipidemia does not seem to play a role in the development of hypertriglyceridemia associated with interferon, and its occurrence and severity are not dependent on the dose. Lifestyle modifications should be encouraged in patients who develop dyslipidemia, and drug treatment should be considered. If drug therapy is indicated, fibric acid derivatives should be considered as first-line therapy. Even at lower doses, this class of drug seems to be effective in managing severe triglyceride elevations in these patients. The Naranjo probability scale of these cases ranged from possible to probable. CONCLUSIONS: Hypertriglyceridemia is a rare but potentially severe adverse consequence of interferon therapy. Patients with malignant melanoma who develop dyslipidemia while receiving interferon should be considered for antidyslipidemic management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".