IOC consensus statement: “training the elite child athlete”
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<h3>Abstract</h3> The human adrenal gland is a complex endocrine tissue. Developmental studies on this tissue have been limited to animal models or human foetus. Here, we present a cell atlas analysis of the adult human normal adrenal gland, combining single-nuclei RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptome data to reconstruct adrenal gland development and tumourigenesis. We identified two populations of potential progenitor cells resident within the adrenal cortex: adrenocortical progenitors NR2F2<sup>+</sup>-ID1<sup>+</sup> cells, located within and underneath the capsule, and medullary progenitors SYT1<sup>+</sup>-CHGA<sup>−</sup> cells, located in islets in the subcapsular region. Using pseudotime analyses, we provided evidence of the centripetal nature of adrenocortical cell development and of the essential role played by the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in the adrenocortical self-renewal. By comparing transcriptional profiles of cells of normal adrenal glands and adrenocortical adenomas we revealed a high heterogeneity with six adenoma-specific clusters. Overall, our results give insights into adrenal plasticity and mechanisms underlying adrenocortical tumourigenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it