MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166602371 · doi:10.1177/1352458510365586

Two-year study of cervical cord volume and myelin water in primary progressive multiple sclerosis

2010· article· en· W2166602371 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMultiple Sclerosis Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMultiple Sclerosis SocietyMultiple Sclerosis Society of CanadaTeva Pharmaceutical Industries
KeywordsExpanded Disability Status ScaleMedicineInterquartile rangeMultiple sclerosisSpinal cordWhite matterGlatiramer acetatePlaceboCordInternal medicineUrologyGastroenterologyNuclear medicineAnesthesiaSurgeryMagnetic resonance imagingPathologyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord involvement in multiple sclerosis (MS) is common and an important element in disability. Previous studies demonstrated smaller cervical cord area at the C2 level in MS compared to controls, and a decrease in cord area over 12 months, most marked in primary progressive MS (PPMS). A subset of subjects participating in a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of glatiramer acetate in PPMS (PROMiSe trial) were followed for 2 years. METHODS: 24 PPMS subjects, randomized to placebo (n = 9) and glatiramer acetate (n = 15), and 24 matched controls were studied. Cervical cord volume (CCV) at C2-3 was determined using a 3D inversion recovery (IR)-prepared spoiled-gradient echo sequence. Myelin water fraction (MWF) at C2-3 was obtained using a 32-echo IR-prepared relaxation sequence. Scans were repeated at baseline, years 1 and 2. RESULTS: Baseline CCV was significantly smaller for PPMS than controls [median (interquartile range) 951 (829-1043) vs. 1072 (1040-1129) mm(3), p = 0.0004] and MWF trended to be lower in PPMS cord [median (interquartile range) 0.225 (0.187-0.267) vs. 0.253 (0.235-0.266), p = 0.12]. Baseline CCV correlated with baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale, disease duration, brain white and grey matter volume. In PPMS, CCV was significantly decreased at year 1 (-0.83%, p = 0.04) and year 2 (-1.65%, p = 0.02). Baseline MWF correlated with baseline CCV and brain white and grey matter volume. MWF was significantly decreased from baseline for PPMS at year 2 (-10.5%, p = 0.01). Treatment effect was not detected on change in CCV nor MWF. CONCLUSIONS: Metrics at the level of the cord, including volume and MWF at C2-3, were lower in PPMS than controls and changed over 2 years only in PPMS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it