MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166824995 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2011.2106050

A Low-Noise Self-Oscillating Mixer Using a Balanced VCO Load

2011· article· en· W2166824995 on OpenAlexafffund
Stanley S. K. Ho, Carlos E. Saavedra

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersCMC Microsystems
KeywordsNoise figureVoltage-controlled oscillatorNoise (video)ChipElectrical engineeringPower (physics)Electrical impedanceLocal oscillatorTopology (electrical circuits)PhysicsRadio frequencyComputer scienceEngineeringCMOSAmplifierVoltageArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A low-noise self-oscillating mixer (SOM) operating from 7.8 to 8.8 GHz is described in this paper. Three different components, the oscillator, the mixer core, and the LNA transconductor stage are assembled in a stacked configuration with full dc current-reuse from the VCO to the mixer to the LNA. The LC-tank oscillator also functions as a double-balanced IF load to the low-noise mixer core. A theoretical expression is given for the conversion gain of the SOM taking into account the time-varying nature of the IF load impedance. Measurements show that the SOM has a minimum DSB noise figure of 4.39 dB and a conversion gain of 11.6 dB. Its input P1 dBis - 13.6 dBm and its output P1 dBis - 2.97 dBm, while its IIP3 and OIP3 are - 8.3 dBm and + 3.3 dBm respectively. The chip consumes 12 mW of dc power and it occupies an area of 0.47 mm2without pads.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular PapersSame topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207