Institucionalización, profesionalización y diálogo sobre la Ciencia Política mundial en Latinoamérica. Reporte del XXI Congreso Mundial de Ciencia Política, Santiago de Chile, 2009
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente reporte es resultado de un ejercicio de observacion e interpretacion que tiene por objeto describir lo relevante, desde nuestra perspectiva, de lo tratado en el XXI Congreso Mundial de Ciencia Politica –celebrado en Santiago de Chile del 12 al 16 de julio de 2009, con el tema Malestar global: dilemas de cambio –, organizado por la Asociacion Internacional de Ciencia Politica (IPSA, por sus siglas en ingles) con sede en Ottawa, Canada. De igual modo, trata de explicar como este encuentro de estudiosos interesados en la ciencia politica constituye una etapa historica del proceso de institucionalizacion, especializacion y profesionalizacion de la ciencia politica en el ambito mundial, aunque destaca mas, por razones entendibles, aspectos de la disciplina en la region latinoamericana. En este sentido, por los temas discutidos y por el conjunto de estudiosos convocados, es nuestro interes dar a conocer a un publico mas amplio los objetivos de la convocatoria, la dinamica, el contexto y los temas de debate en dicho congreso, asi como las posibles perspectivas de la ciencia politica en la actualidad
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".