MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166919919 · doi:10.1002/star.201000020

Binding of amino acids to hypochlorite‐oxidized potato starch

2010· article· en· W2166919919 on OpenAlexaff
Jihong Li, Thava Vasanthan, David C. Bressler, Robert T. Tyler

Bibliographic record

VenueStarch - Stärke · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFood composition and properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStarchSodium hypochloriteChemistryDerivatizationPotato starchAmino acidAqueous solutionHypochloriteNitrogenOrganic chemistryBiochemistryHigh-performance liquid chromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Novel starch derivatives were prepared by derivatization of oxidized potato starch with amino acids in aqueous suspension. Potato starch was oxidized using sodium hypochlorite and then reacted with amino acids under mildly alkaline conditions. By analysis of increased nitrogen content and by means of confocal laser scanning microscopy, efficient binding of positively charged amino acids to oxidized starch molecules was confirmed. A degree of substitution (DS) of up to 0.015 was obtained using oxidized starch (degree of oxidation (DO) of up to 1.0%) and positively charged amino acids (2–5%, dry starch basis) at reaction conditions of starch/water ratio of 1:2–2.5, pH 10, 40°C, 30–60 min. The DS was positively correlated with the DO of the starch. Derivatization of oxidized starch using amino acids generally enhanced the influence of oxidation on starch pasting characteristics, perhaps showing interesting functional properties and potential industrial application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStarch - StärkeSame topicFood composition and propertiesFrench-language works237,207