MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166922907 · doi:10.1093/pcp/pcn023

Identification of Genes Expressed in Vascular Tissues Using NPA-Induced Vascular Overgrowth in Arabidopsis

2008· article· en· W2166922907 on OpenAlexaff
Carol L. Wenzel, Qian Hester, Jim Mattsson

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant and Cell Physiology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Molecular Biology Research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArabidopsisVascular tissueBiologyPhloemGeneXylemVascular bundleGene expressionArabidopsis thalianaAuxinMicroarray analysis techniquesCell biologyMicroarrayMutantGeneticsBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The genetic basis of vascular differentiation and function is relatively poorly understood, partly due to the difficulty of screening for mutants defective in internal vascular tissues. Here we present an approach based on a predicted increase in vascular-related gene expression in response to an auxin transport inhibitor-induced vascular overgrowth. We used microarray analyses to identify 336 genes that were up-regulated > or =2-fold in shoot tissues of Arabidopsis thaliana showing vascular overgrowth. Promoter-marker gene fusions revealed that 38 out of 40 genes with > or =4-fold up-regulation in vascular overgrowth tissues had vascular-related expression in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Obtained expression patterns included cambial tissues and differentiating xylem, phloem and fibers. A total of 15 genes were found to have vascular-specific expression patterns in the leaves and/or inflorescence stems. This study provides empirical evidence of the efficiency of the approach and describes for the first time the in situ expression patterns of the majority of the assessed genes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.553
Threshold uncertainty score0.213

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant and Cell PhysiologySame topicPlant Molecular Biology ResearchFrench-language works237,207