Isolation of a Novel Carotenoid-rich Protein in Cyanophora paradoxa that is Immunologically Related to the Light-harvesting Complexes of Photosynthetic Eukaryotes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Novel eukaryotic chlorophyll-carotenoid proteins have evolved at least twice following the origin of the plastid and include the widely distributed integral membrane light-harvesting complexes (LHCs) and the dinoflagellate-specific soluble peridinin-chlorophyll proteins. In the glaucophytes, homologs of these proteins are reportedly absent. We have identified a novel carotenoid-rich protein (CRP) in the glaucophyte Cyanophora paradoxa that is 28 kDa and immunologically related to the family of LHCs. CRP is associated with the thylakoid membrane, though it can be removed by stringent washes, suggesting that there are probably significant structural differences between CRP and the LHCs. CRP co-localizes with a zeaxanthin-rich thylakoid membrane fraction that also contains beta-carotene, chlorophyll and an unidentified carotenoid. Despite this, we found no evidence for carotenoid-chlorophyll energy transfer in the isolated complex, suggesting that light harvesting may not be a primary function. The presence of CRP in C. paradoxa is evidence for the evolution of a novel pigment-binding protein in the glaucophytes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".