MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167035884 · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e31816725bc

Management of In-flight Medical Emergencies

2008· review· en· W2167035884 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Keith J. Ruskin, Keith A. Hernandez, Paul G. Barash, Bruno Riou

Bibliographic record

VenueAnesthesiology · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTravel-related health issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMedical emergencyAeronauticsIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MORE than two billion passengers board commercial airplanes every year.§Airline travel is inherently safe and reasonably comfortable, but factors including psychological stress, jet lag, and preexisting disease cause a small number of passengers to become ill while flying. The average age of airline passengers is increasing with that of the general population, and older passengers may have one or more underlying illnesses that impair their ability to adapt to a potentially stressful environment. New, larger airplanes such as the Airbus A380 (Airbus S.A.S., Toulouse, France) may carry twice the number of passengers as current aircraft (more than 800 passengers), which further increases the probability that a medical emergency will occur on any given flight. Physicians who care for a patient who has a serious illness and who wishes to travel may refer to a comprehensive set of medical guidelines for air travel, including a list of contraindications to flight prepared by the Aerospace Medical Association.1The regulations governing aviation are complex, and the laws of the aircraft’s country of registration primarily regulate training and the provision of emergency medical care aboard airplanes. This article focuses on US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations that apply to medical emergencies.The precise incidence of in-flight medical emergencies is unknown because minor events are probably not reported and there is no central data repository for the majority of events that require medical care. The US National Transportation Safety Board requires that only events resulting in hospitalization for more than 48 h, fracture of any bone (except finger, nose, or toe fractures), or injury to an internal organ be reported as an accident. An FAA study found that 1,132 medical emergencies occurred on flights in the United States during 1996 and 1997, which correlates to an incidence of 13 reported events per day.∥Two additional studies have estimated the incidence on US flights to be 1 passenger per 39,600.2Almost half (47%) of the passengers who became ill were sent to an emergency department, and 10% were admitted to the hospital.3In contrast, a British study estimated that one event occurs per 14,000 passengers, corresponding to more than 350 events per day.#The British report does not provide statistics on treatment or passenger disposition.Several recent studies suggest that the frequency of in-flight medical events on board international flights is increasing.4Several causes for this increase have been postulated, including aging passenger population and routine travel on flights of longer duration. Further, the US Department of Transportation requires airlines to carry passengers with disabilities. There is, however, an exemption that allows carriers to refuse transportation if a disabled passenger would endanger the health or safety of other passengers. Moreover, proposed changes to US Department of Transportation regulations would require air carriers to transport passengers who use supplemental oxygen, continuous positive airway pressure, and artificial airways. Under the new regulations, these passengers could travel without medical assistance.Members of the flight crew may also become incapacitated during flight. Airline pilots are required to undergo a physical examination every 6 months that includes a screening test for diabetes mellitus, an electrocardiogram at age 35 yr, and yearly electrocardiograms after age 40 yr. Despite close medical observation, however, members of the flight crew have required emergency medical care during flight. Air France reported that 10 pilots (total 1,800 pilots) were incapacitated between 1968 and 1988. Causes included cardiac dysrhythmias, seizures, and hypoglycemia. In one instance, an entire cockpit crew was incapacitated as a result of carbon dioxide from improperly packaged dry ice.5Most in-flight medical events are relatively minor and can be treated without the assistance of a trained volunteer. The most common in-flight emergencies are fainting, near fainting, hyperventilation, and vasovagal episodes. In one study, neurologic, cardiac, and respiratory problems are responsible for the most serious events during flight and accounted for the majority of emergency landings.2,4One major airline separately published its medical events; in the year studied, syncope accounted for 15% of complaints, followed by trauma (12%), gastrointestinal disorders (12%), and respiratory events (11%).6A separate study found that psychiatric illness accounted for approximately 3.5% of calls to a ground-based consulting service, with the majority of cases diagnosed as acute anxiety.7Passengers can sustain injuries from items falling from overhead luggage bins or during turbulent flight.Children rarely become ill while traveling. A total of 222 in-flight consultations for pediatric emergencies were recorded on a major US airline between 1995 and 2001. The most common pediatric emergency was infectious disease (27%), followed by neurologic (15%) and respiratory illnesses (13%). International flights had the highest incidence of pediatric medical emergencies. The emergency medical kit was used for 60 events, and 19 events required diversion to an alternate airport.8Commercial airplanes operate at altitudes between 24,000 feet (7,315 m) and 40,000 feet (12,192 m), which requires that the passenger cabin be pressurized and heated. The barometric pressure (Pb) inside the passenger cabin of most commercial airplanes is equal to that of an altitude of 8,000 feet (2,400 m) above sea level. The barometric pressure in most commercial jets begins to decrease when the airplane climbs through an altitude of 2,400 m and increases when the airplane begins its descent. Pressure changes occur slowly to minimize discomfort. Although most passengers tolerate this environment without adverse effects, decreased atmospheric pressure, extremely dry air (less than 10% relative humidity), and mild hypoxia (arterial oxygen tension [Pao2] approximately 55 mmHg) that occurs during flight may exacerbate certain illnesses.Dalton’s law states that the partial pressure of a gas is the pressure that it would exert if it alone occupied the space containing a gas mixture. The composition of air is constant, but Pb decreases exponentially with altitude, reducing the partial pressure of oxygen (Po2). According to the alveolar gas equation, at sea level (Pb 760 mmHg), if arterial carbon dioxide tension (Paco2) is 40 mmHg, Pao2is 100 mmHg. At 2,400 m (Pb 565 mmHg), Po2is 118 mmHg, Pao2is 55 mmHg, and arterial oxygen saturation (Sao2) is 89%, which is well tolerated by most healthy travelers. When Pao2decreases below this level, however, the affinity of hemoglobin for oxygen decreases rapidly, and a relatively small decrease in Pao2produces a large decrease in oxygen saturation (fig. 1).The symptoms of hypoxia are cumulative and time related. Increased minute ventilation and increased cardiac output maintain oxygen delivery at a safe level despite decreasing Pao2. Above 3,048 m, these normal compensatory mechanisms are insufficient to maintain oxygen delivery, and symptomatic hypoxia may occur. Hypoxia due to impaired gas exchange is exacerbated by decreased oxygen carrying capacity. Chronic smokers, for example, may have mean carboxyhemoglobin levels of 5%, which further increases after smoking, and thus significantly decreases blood oxygen content.9Decreased blood flow (e.g. , congestive heart failure) may further impair oxygen delivery. As a result, a passenger with obstructive pulmonary disease who has a Pao2of 60 mmHg at sea level and 10% carboxyhemoglobin after smoking may be unable to tolerate decreased barometric pressure during flight.At a constant temperature, the volume of gas in an enclosed space varies inversely with pressure (Boyle’s law). As a result, the volume of gas in spaces such as the inner ear or a loop of bowel can increase by up to 30% during flight. Therefore, many passengers experience minor otolaryngologic symptoms such as transient decrease in hearing acuity or minor ear and sinus pain.1Because gases contained within closed spaces expand during flight, surgical wound dehiscence10and spontaneous rupture of bronchogenic cysts and pulmonary bullae have been reported (fig. 2).11Medical devices are also affected. Pneumatic splints, feeding tubes, and endotracheal or tracheostomy tube cuffs will expand as cabin pressure decreases.The amount of gas dissolved in a given volume of liquid is directly proportional to the partial pressure of the gas (Henry’s law). When barometric pressure is abruptly decreased, the nitrogen leaves solution and forms gas emboli. Passengers who have been scuba diving within 24 h of flight are at risk of developing decompression sickness. Decompression sickness is caused by nitrogen that accumulates in the body during exposure to high barometric pressure (i.e. , during scuba dives). A person with mild decompression sickness may report itching or tingling (“the creeps”). Joint or muscle pain (“the bends”) is the most common symptom of decompression sickness; pulmonary gas emboli (“the chokes”) or central nervous system involvement may also occur. All are potentially life threatening. The risk of developing decompression sickness increases with age and obesity, geometrically with shorter preflight surface intervals, and dives to greater depths on the last day.12As a result, the FAA recommends a 24-h surface interval between scuba diving and flying. Data from a recent study suggest that elderly airline passengers may be at risk for developing gas emboli when exposed to normal in-flight cabin pressure.13Cold, dry outside air is heated and compressed by the engine before it is circulated through the cabin. As a result, the relative humidity of air entering the cabin varies from 0 to 10%. This very dry air can exacerbate reactive airway diseases such as asthma and also accelerates the rate of dehydration. The Boeing 787 Dreamliner (Boeing Company, Chicago, IL) uses a novel design to compress and heat cabin air, enabling it to maintain a relative humidity of 30%. Its design also significantly decreases the level of volatile organic compounds entering the cabin. The design of the airplane also allows it to withstand a greater pressure differential so that the minimum pressure in the cabin is equivalent to that at 6,000 feet (1,829 m).Fresh air entering the cabin is first passed through a catalytic converter to remove ozone and then through a charcoal filter that removes volatile organic compounds such as fuel vapors. A high efficiency particulate air filter then removes particles as small as 0.3 μm.1,10Despite this processing, however, compounds such as pesticides, and contaminants entering the airplane can degrade air quality. In some airplanes, cabin air is recirculated, in which case it is mixed with 50% fresh air. In contrast, 80% of the air is recirculated in most commercial buildings.14The air inside the cabin is relatively free of contaminants, but upper respiratory tract infections are common after commercial flight. The most likely reason is that a large number of people are placed in close proximity within a confined environment. Recirculated cabin air does not seem to increase the risk of contracting an upper respiratory tract infection.15The most common pathogens in airline passengers who subsequently experienced a respiratory infection included influenza and parainfluenza viruses.The association between deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and air travel remains controversial. Asymptomatic DVT was found to occur in 10% of individuals who did not wear venous compression stockings on flights lasting at least 8 h; no thromboses were found in those who wore stockings.16Another study of passengers traveling through Charles de Gaulle International Airport (Paris, France) between 1993 and 2000 reported 56 incidents of pulmonary thromboembolism occurred in 135 million passengers.17The occurrence rate in this study, however, may be less than that of the general population.18Last, a large, well-designed meta-analysis found that long-distance airline travel does not increase the risk of DVT or pulmonary thromboembolism.19Deep vein thromboses that occur during flight may be caused by factors including venous stasis and increased blood viscosity due to dehydration. Recent studies suggest that the incidence of DVT during commercial air travel is low. It seems reasonable, however, to recommend that passengers on long distance flights walk periodically, drink water frequently to avoid dehydration, and consider the use of compression stockings if they are otherwise susceptible to DVT. The diagnosis of pulmonary thromboembolism should be considered in a passenger with risk factors who suddenly develops pleuritic chest pain associated with shortness of breath.The FAA mandates that flight crews receive training in the management of in-flight medical emergencies. This training includes coordination among crew members, the location, function, and operation of emergency medical equipment, and the contents of the emergency medical kit. Flight attendants are also required to undergo training in the use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation every 2 yr. Although flight attendants are required to demonstrate understanding of the procedures involved, their skills are not required to be equivalent to those of a physician or other medical personnel. The FAA has even gone a step further, and specifically states that crew members are not required to provide emergency medical care.Anesthesiologists receive training in physiology, critical care, and crew resource management and are uniquely qualified to provide assistance. Almost one third of anesthesiologists responding to a survey had offered their assistance during an in-flight emergency, with almost 10% participating in more than one event.20A healthcare professional assisted in 69% of all in-flight medical events. Physicians assisted in 40% of events, nurses participated in 25% of emergencies, and allied health professionals such as emergency medical technicians made up the rest. The Aviation Medical Assistance Act of 1998 protects physicians who provide medical assistance while on airplanes registered in the United States. The law protects physicians who offer their services voluntarily, receive no monetary compensation, and render care in good faith. The quality of care must be similar to that which would be provided by other physicians with similar training.**To our knowledge, no physician has been successfully sued in the United States for rendering medical care on an airplane under these circumstances. Although physicians in the United States, Canada, or the United Kingdom are not required to respond to a call for help, the European Union and Australia obligate them to care for a passenger who becomes ill. Moreover, the Tokyo Convention of 1963 allows passengers to take any action necessary to prevent a disruptive passenger from endangering the safety of others.21The pilot in command of the airplane is the ultimate authority for the safety of flight, including the sick passenger. The flight crew is primarily responsible for responding to a passenger who becomes acutely ill, while medically qualified volunteers may provide assistance when requested. Each airline implements its own policies for management of in-flight medical emergencies, with guidance from the Federal Aviation Regulations. Any member of the flight crew may ask a volunteer to administer treatment, discuss the case with ground-based medical personnel, or return to his or her seat.Commercial airplanes with more than 30 passenger seats are required to carry one or more emergency medical kits. These kits are required to contain specific equipment and medications (table 1). The kits on many airlines exceed the minimum FAA standards. Several airlines have augmented their onboard medical kits to include cardiac medications, sedatives, diuretics, and advanced airway management equipment. In addition to emergency medical kits, US-registered aircraft are required to carry between one and four basic first aid kits (table 2), depending on the number of passengers for which the airplane is configured. European airlines carry the equipment mandated in the US medical kit and also include other drugs such as furosemide, oxytocin, and steroids.Limited supplies of supplemental oxygen are available if needed. Airlines are required to carry at least enough first aid oxygen to supply 2% of the passengers for the entire flight. The cylinders are equipped with regulators that are designed to provide a flow rate of 2 or the flow rate to 2 at a pressure altitude of 2,400 m a of oxygen of which a to sea level. It has been that passengers on commercial airline flights who to use should undergo a preflight medical carry oxygen with them on the and have a for and management of the of on airplanes, as many as passengers per year were estimated to as a result of a commercial flights with at least one flight are required to carry an and these devices have been to by at a less than US per life are designed to administer a only if or is airlines carry defibrillators that include an electrocardiogram these devices can also be used as a cardiac to in the crew members receive training in the operation of airlines only flight attendants with the operation of the and not a physician to and operate the for medical to the emergency and treatment of passengers among airlines will the emergency kit only to physicians can be healthcare or a flight may have to the emergency kit when under the of a physician in flight or in with a Flight attendants may ask for medications the but should be used when in or from unknown no longer only on the that a qualified physician will volunteer to a passenger who is ill. major airlines provide internal or ground-based medical consulting services with physicians trained in emergency and In it is the of at least one major airline to their ground-based and only assistance from a medically trained volunteer if to so by the such medical assistance to flight crews of commercial and jets and at sea through a medical in These in in-flight emergencies and and physician volunteers as to differential and treatment also of with to emergency medical services to a specific a between the onboard physician and the ground-based the will with the of the ground-based a passenger is extremely ill, it may be necessary to at an due to an in-flight medical emergency result in and for the the sick and on the flight. the of a medical event be may result in at with which the flight crew is not Although airlines not the of diversion for a medical emergency, it has been estimated to be between and will the of their ground-based before the flight, and the ultimate to with the pilot in the of this it is to recommend specific management but it is to general to provide medical physicians should their ability to should not volunteer if they have or central nervous system Medical volunteers should be prepared to a of as a medical or that their The physician must all from the flight who will that for the sick or passenger does not endanger the safety of Medical volunteers should well within their level of laws offer only to volunteers who provide treatment that physician would have a passenger becomes ill during flight, the are to oxygen and medical equipment, ask for and use any when and suggest diversion if it will be of to the The of in-flight medical assistance is to the patient and the flight crew as to a diagnosis and In when the volunteer should from ground-based medical and suggest diversion of the aircraft to an alternate The amount of space available medical treatment a the passenger in his or her is the this is the patient may be to an or or to the first or at the of the flight the patient in an should be if because it will impair the ability of the flight crew to their required the passenger and physician not a common flight members, or other passengers may be to with should be if the passenger chest shortness of or medical and physical with treatment during flight, should be airlines have forms for this is if the passenger is to a because the physician will not be to or her and because symptoms may when cabin pressure is assistance to an airline passenger who becomes ill during flight is and requires an understanding of to flight. requires and crew resource management as a routine of their and may be uniquely qualified to the call when a physician is to or for her assistance in the of this

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.919

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnesthesiologySame topicTravel-related health issuesFrench-language works237,207