Image-to-X Registration using Linear Features
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The registration of imagery to maps and GIS layers is a fundamental operation for the management of spatial data in GIS. This paper introduces automated algorithms for the registration of sequences of aerial imagery to vector map data using linear features (primarily roads) as control information. Our algorithms support both the use of single elements as well as complete networks. Regarding single elements, our method is based on the extraction of linear features using active contour models (a.k.a. snakes), followed by the construction of a polygonal template upon which a matching process is applied. To accommodate more robust matching, this work presents both exact and inexact matching schemes for linear features. Additionally, in order to overcome the influence of the snakes-based extraction process on the matching results, a matching refinement process is suggested. This information is used to generate image mosaics and register these mosaics to a map. The performance of the proposed scheme was tested on sequences of aerial imagery of 1 m resolution that were subjected to shifts and rotations using both the exact and inexact matching scheme, and was shown to produce angular accuracies of less than 0.7 degrees and positional accuracies of less than 2 pixels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it