MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167091193 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2014-0177

Operation of multimodal transport system during mass evacuations

2014· article· en· W2167091193 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hana Naghawi, Brian Wolshon

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEvacuation and Crowd Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFederal Emergency Management AgencyChina Academy of Engineering PhysicsAustralian GovernmentU.S. Department of Transportation
KeywordsTransport engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringForensic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Among the shortcomings identified in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans was the need for improved disaster planning for persons without access to personal transportation. Inadequate advanced planning for limited mobility evacuees in New Orleans prior to 2005 left a significant portion of the local population unable to flee in advance of the storm. Since 2005, state and local officials in Louisiana have developed transit assisted mass evacuation plans that now seek to accommodate carless populations. Since this plan is relatively new and does not have a history of experience on which to base its performance, it is difficult to know how well, or even if, it will work. Recently, an effort was undertaken to apply microscopic scale traffic simulation to evaluate key aspects of the New Orleans assisted evacuation plan. This study is thought to be significant because it is among the first ever to model transit bus-based evacuation processes, including the loading and unloading and the movement of individual evacuees and vehicles. Although this was a simulation-based theoretical study, the routes, timing and movements of people and busses are based on the actual plan and the results of the model have been verified, validated, and calibrated to capture the essence of the Hurricane Katrina evacuation process of 2005. This paper describes the development of this model as well as the results gained from it. In the research, two sets of transit bus routing scenarios were developed and modeled for New Orleans. Measures such as evacuation time, average travel time, average evacuation speed, and queue length were used to evaluate the performance of the transit bus movements within the general evacuation. Additional measures such as the walking and waiting times of evacuees moving to bus pick-up points were also used to assess loading processes. Among the general findings of the research was that routing busses to alternate arterial routes reduced the overall travel time by as much as 53% and the total evacuation time by up to 10% in some cases. It was also found that the transit evacuation had quite small impacts on the overall movement of evacuation traffic, but did increase queue lengths on some segments of the evacuation network. Finally, it was found that the planned location of bus pick-up points limited average walking time for evacuees to a half hour or less.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.161
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicEvacuation and Crowd DynamicsFrench-language works237,207