MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Single‐point mutations at the surface of MB‐1Trp lead to important changes in its conformational properties

2004· article· en· W2167144649 on OpenAlexaff
Maxime Sasseville, S. Claveau, Mylène Gagnon, Marc Beauregard

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Peptide Research · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiopolymer Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCircular dichroismPoint mutationMutantDenaturation (fissile materials)Melting temperatureMutationChemistryAmino acidProtein structureBiophysicsMutagenesisProtein tertiary structureBiochemistryProtein foldingMelting pointCrystallographyBiologyMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Protein design is currently used for the creation of new proteins with desirable traits. In our lab we focus on the synthesis of proteins with high essential amino acid content having potential applications in animal nutrition. One of the limitations we face in this endeavour is achieving stable proteins despite a highly biased amino acid content. We report here the synthesis and the characterization of three variants of MB-1Trp in which two solvent-exposed Leu have been replaced by Glu allowing for the formation of new salt bridges at the surface of the protein. Although both mutations were expected to be similar (i.e. same mutation in a comparable local environment), they appear to have different effects on MB-1Trp as shown by far-UV circular dichroism, thermal denaturation, fluorescence and proteolytic resistance measurements. For the mutation Leu68Glu, an increase in the protein melting temperature of 6 degrees C was observed. Surprisingly, the mutation in position Leu19Glu led to a decrease in melting temperature and a modification of tertiary structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Peptide ResearchSame topicBiopolymer Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207