Analytical Modeling of Cyclic Thermal Stress and Strain in Plated-Through-Vias With Defects
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A previously published analytical model for thermal stress and strain in idealized plated-through-vias (PTVs) has been adapted to conduct elastic-plastic analyses of vias with geometric defects using elastic stress concentration factors calculated earlier. The von Mises stress amplitude, at the mid-plane of the perfect via and at the defect (Δσ <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0</sub> and Δσ, respectively), and the cumulative plastic von Mises strain, also at the mid-plane of a perfect via and at a defect (ε <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0</sub> <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">pl</sup> and ε <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">pl</sup> , respectively), compared well with results of finite element analyses (FEAs). Four types of PTV defects were evaluated: barrel thickness reduction, occasional waviness, continuous waviness, and wicking. This model provides a relatively simple alternative to FEA to calculate stresses and strains in vias with defects as well as in perfect vias subjected to multiple thermal cycles. This model provides a tool to investigate quickly the influence of possible PTV design dimensions and defects under thermal cycling conditions (i.e., which are particularly damaging in a given situation). It is much easier than FEA for parametric studies like this. It also provides a means for calculating damage metrics, such as the cumulative von Mises strain, which can then be empirically correlated with the cycles to failure data from thermal cycling tests of PTVs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it