Optical properties of thick metal nanohole arrays fabricated by electron‐beam and nanosphere lithography
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Optically thick metallic nanohole structures were fabricated using two different methods – electron‐beam and nanosphere lithography. The nanosphere lithography technique was based on self‐assembling of polystyrene or silica nanospheres (0.560–1.25 μm in diameter) followed by the deposition of a silver film. The holes size and periodicity of the patterns as well as optical properties (transmission and reflection in the Visible–NIR) of the structures were investigated. The extraordinary optical transmission (EOT) was studied experimentally in both structures and it was found to be dependent on the geometrical parameters (holes shape, diameter and periodicity of structures). As the samples were made for long range order, the effect of the defects like missing holes, change of periodicity or variation of the holes shape, were also studied. The experimental results, especially the position of the SPR band in the different nanohole structures, were compared with those found by simulation carried out with 3D FDTD (finite difference time domain). (© 2009 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it