MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167357461 · doi:10.1144/gsl.sp.2002.203.01.16

Grain-size characteristics and provenance of ice-proximal glacial marine sediments

2002· article· en· W2167357461 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John T. Andrews, Sarah M. Principato

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society London Special Publications · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProvenanceGlacial periodGeologyGrain sizeOceanographyPhysical geographyGeochemistryGeomorphologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper addresses the issue of the characteristic grain-size spectra of glacial and glacial marine sediments, an important topic because of the increasing emphasis on the use of specific sand-size fractions as indicators of iceberg rafting. Different methods of IRD identification can lead to different palaeoclimatic interpretations. We use three methods of grain-size analyses, with examples from the Labrador Sea, East Greenland, North Iceland, and the Ross Sea, Antarctica. The first method illustrates the ‘real’ grain size of glacial marine sediments by an examination of X-radiographs by image analysis and the sizing of clasts larger than 2 mm. Typically, grain-size analyses only apply to the matrix fraction of the sediment (smaller than 2 mm), and ignore the larger size clasts. The mean grain size appears to be between 8 to 10 mm. The second method includes counting the number of clasts larger than 2 mm from X-radiographs, and counts of particles (106–1000 μm). These latter counts show that diamictons from the North Iceland shelf indicate a dominance of glacially abraded basaltic grains, but they also contain a small, consistent proportion of angular volcanic glass shards of various compositions. The third method is to examine grain-size spectra of surface samples from East Greenland and the Ross Sea region of Antarctica and compare these data with down-core data from neoglacial-age glacial marine sediments from Nansen Fjord, East Greenland, and with late glacial diamictons from the North Iceland shelf. These sediments have a mode in the silt fraction, but they frequently have secondary peaks in the coarse sand and fine sand/coarse silt areas, and a trough in the range of 100 to 500 μm (medium to coarse sand). Most of the sediment samples analysed in this study contain 20–50% in the below 1 μm grain size, which reinforces the importance of examining this fraction in provenance studies in glacial marine sediments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society London Special PublicationsSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207