MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An improved method for determining renal sufficiency using volume of distribution and weight from bolus 99mTc-DTPA, two blood sample, paediatric data

2006· article· en· W2167473547 on OpenAlexaff
Carl A. Wesolowski, Paul Babyn, R. C. Puetter

Bibliographic record

VenueNuclear Medicine Communications · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenal functionNuclear medicineMedicineMathematicsBody surface areaVolume of distributionEstimatorBolus (digestion)UrologyStatisticsInternal medicinePharmacokinetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To find an improved method of determining renal sufficiency by exploring power functions for estimating normal value, E(arg), single compartment glomerular filtration rate (G1), rate constant (gamma) and renal sufficiency index, RSI = gamma/E(gamma) = G1/E(G1), using compartment volume (V), patient mass ( W), patient age (A), patient height (H), and sex (S). To present the best estimator of normal, E(G1) = f(V, W). METHODS: One hundred and thirty 99mTc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) combined imaging and G1 studies in 97 children were screened by findings and history to obtain 44 normal studies of patients 1.46-18.5 years of age with blood samples at 109 (90-214) and 152 (120-246) min. Normal studies were used to generate predictive formulae. RESULTS: For power functions, [equation: see text] the statistically acceptable formulae in descending order of adjusted R2 were f(V, W), f(V,A), f(V,H), f(V), f(W,A,H), f( W), f(H) and f(A). Relationships of the body surface area type, f(W, H, S) and f(W, H), were statistically unwarranted. Kleiber's law, E(G1) proportional to W(3/4), with E(G1) = 6.9190W(0.7618) found here, allowed confirmation of GFRinulin approximately 0.87G1. The best estimator is f(V, W) = 10.998V(0.64717 W(0.20185), and may relate to a volumetric measure of body habitus. To verify methods, Monte Carlo simulation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and f(V, W) was performed and yielded less than 5% precision error, 98% of the time. Normal RSI from f(V, W) had the smallest standard deviation, 11.3%, no regression bias over a six-fold range on a Bland-Altman ratio plot, p = 0.4, and good agreement with clinical classification at 95% specificity (RSI > 0.8589, Cohen's Kappa 0.70+/-0.062 (mean+/-bootstrap standard error). CONCLUSIONS: The best RSI from f(V, W) is RSI = 90.927gammaV(0.35283)W(-0.20185) and should detect mildly (14.1%) reduced renal sufficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score0.621

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNuclear Medicine CommunicationsSame topicPediatric Urology and Nephrology StudiesFrench-language works237,207