Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 1980, our research group at the faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto, demonstrated that young elm seedlings (4 years old) acquired resistance against aggressive strains of the Dutch elm disease pathogen (Ophiostoma novo- ulmi) when they were first inoculated with non-aggressive strains (O. ulmi) of the pathogen. This work was repeated in 2000 and 2002 with elm trees between 15 and 20 years of age. These trees were stem inoculated at breast height with O. ulmi and challenged with O. novo- ulmi, imitating the infection process by the European elm bark beetle. In general, the experiments indicated that non-aggressive strains, inoculated into the stem of 15-20-year-old conditioned trees, may produce disease symptoms but trees generally survive. This is in contrast to the unconditioned controls. These experiments further indicate that this type of induced resistance does not confer absolute immunity or protection under all circumstances but reduces considerably the disease severity and protects the tree from super-infection. Work based on induced resistance in elms in our laboratory led to the isolation of a glycoprotein that elicited defense mechanisms in the tree. Determination of the amino acid and DNA sequence of the glycoprotein resulted in the characterization of the elicitor gene. Field experiments on 5-year-old elm seedlings and 10 to 15 year old trees led to the following conclusions: the success of the elicitor treatment in protecting the tree against pathogen attack depends on the genetic constitution of the tree, its health and on environmental conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".