MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167614636 · doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.08.014

Gasless laparoscopic management of ovarian cysts during pregnancy

2005· article· en· W2167614636 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hiroyoshi Oguri, Kohei Taniguchi, Tomohiro Fukaya

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOvarian cystPregnancySurgeryCystectomyLaparoscopyCystBladder cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ovarian cysts are commonly found on ultrasound examination during early pregnancy. Until recently, laparoscopy during pregnancy was not encouraged, but some reports have appeared on its safety [1], [2]. In this study (Canadian Task Force classification III), the safety of gasless laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy during pregnancy was evaluated retrospectively. Thirteen patients underwent gasless laparoscopic surgery with subcutaneous lifting of the abdominal wall. General anesthesia was performed in all patients, of whom 11 also received epidural anesthesia and 2 received a muscle relaxant. The 13 procedures were performed using the transperitoneal technique. After the cyst was punctured and its contents aspirated endoscopically, the adnexa was pulled through the port site and cystectomy was performed. The adnexa was then repositioned in the peritoneal cavity. Patient characteristics, pathologic diagnoses, and maternal and neonatal outcomes are presented in Table 1. All operations were performed between 10 and 17 weeks of pregnancy: 4 at 10 weeks, 3 at 11 weeks, 2 at 12 weeks, 2 at 14 weeks, 1 at 16 weeks, and 1 at 17 weeks. Main tumor diameters ranged from 54 to 130 mm. Dermoid cysts were found in 11 of the 13 patients, and there were 1 corpus luteum cyst and 1 serous cystadenoma. Postoperative complications included uterine contractions in 3 women and vaginal bleeding in 4 women, but these symptoms resolved shortly after surgery. Complications following discharge included 2 threatened preterm deliveries and 2 cases of pre-eclampsia; however, all complications were successfully managed at the outpatient clinic. All patients were delivered between 37 and 40 weeks of pregnancy. One neonate was delivered at 39 weeks with a low birth weight that was still adequate for gestational age, and another had mild hyperbilirubinemia. None of the neonates had serious complications or anomalies. It has been suggested that conventional laparoscopy, with insufflation of carbon dioxide, can lead to fetal complications such as fetal hypercarbia and fetal acidosis [1], and that premature labor can occur from the increased intra-abdominal pressure. Gasless laparoscopy, however, is not associated with risks arising from carbon dioxide insufflation. Patients in this study did not experience severe postoperative complications. All patients were delivered at term from healthy neonates. Given the small number of patients, the maternal and fetal safety of the procedure can not be determined. However, this study suggests that laparoscopic surgery can be safely performed for benign ovarian cysts discovered during pregnancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Gynecology & ObstetricsSame topicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207