Constructing Beauty: The Photographs Documenting the Construction of the Bloor Viaduct
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article est une tude de cas mettant l'accent sur une slection de photographies prises par le dfunt Arthur S. Goss, photographe de la ville de Toronto, et portant sur la construction du viaduc Bloor.L'auteure examine l'importance du contexte politique et bureaucratique entourant la prise des photographies et se demande comment cette connaissance peut modifier l'interprtation et la comprhension de la narration du rcit photographique.L'article soutient que l'objectif de la ville de Toronto en crant la srie de photographies, c'est--dire documenter le progrs de la construction et illustrer la croissance de la ville, ne rflte qu'une partie du rcit des faits et que ce n'est que quand les archivistes et les chercheurs prennent en compte le contexte fonctionnel de la cration que les photographies peuvent le mieux tre utilises pour clairer une partie de l'histoire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it